ImageMagick Versus GD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ImageMagick Versus GD
From: <emre@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:05:08 +0300
Delivered-to: mailing list php-general@lists.php.net
Delivered-to: ezmlm-scan-php-general@lists.php.net
Delivered-to: ezmlm-php-general@lists.php.net
List-help: <mailto:php-general-help@lists.php.net>
List-post: <mailto:php-general@lists.php.net>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net>
References: <20050405002150.97548.qmail@lists.php.net> <019501c539a2$61a29fa0$bf6aaec3@hermoine> <01b601c539a3$149e0540$bf6aaec3@hermoine>

which one is better ImageMagick or GD?

infact I am much more curious about their image processing speed and server load. especially resizing large imagefiles.

thx in adv.

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ImageMagick Versus GD
  - From: Richard Lynch

References:
- Set session variable if link is clicked, do not want to use GET
  - From: Kent
- Re: Set session variable if link is clicked, do not want to use GET
  - From: emre
- Re: Set session variable if link is clicked, do not want to use GET
  - From: emre

Prev by Date: Re: Why do I have to declare __set if I declare __get for read-only properties?
Next by Date: Re: Accented character 'echo'ed randomly
Previous by thread: Re: Set session variable if link is clicked, do not want to use GET
Next by thread: Re: ImageMagick Versus GD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [PHP Home] [Apache Users] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Install] [PHP Classes] [Pear] [Postgresql] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP on Windows] [PHP Database Programming] [PHP SOAP]

Powered by Linux