xfedex wrote: <snip all my stuff>
Here is my test in a PIII 550Mhz 128mb with gentoo:
for ($i = 0; $i <= 9999; $i++) { $include = 'db_connect.php'; include('include/'.$include); }
3.623316 seconds --------------------------------------
for ($i = 0; $i <= 9999; $i++) { $include = "db_connect.php"; include("include/$include"); }
3.696468 seconds
meatbread.
So basically, I run the test 20 times, include 1000 _different_ files for both single and double quotes in each test, and come up with a mean of about 3 one-thousands of a second in favor of double quotes. Not totally scientific but produces a fairly accurate result.
You on the other hand, run a test including the _same_ file 10,000 times (which brings into play error handling if you define a function in that include file) and produce a result with a difference of about 7 one-hundredth of a second. A bit less scientific, but still produces a fairly accurate result.
With all that said...
1) The time difference in either test if way too small to make a difference.
2) It's a far cry from one of your earlier posts which read, "Well....i have a 30k script, with double i get 8 or 9 seconds, with
sigle i get 0.05 or 0.08 seconds. The script basically made a lot of
querys, its part of a user manager module of a system im writing."
3) Meatbread indeed.
-- By-Tor.com ...it's all about the Rush http://www.by-tor.com
-- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
