Re: apache 1 vs 2 w/php

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Sebastian <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I am undecided whether to upgrade to apache 2 (currently running 1.3.33)
> I've heard some bad stuff (some good maybe) about using apache 2 with php..
> does anyone have an opinions?
>
> I know everything has cons/pros but i am just looking for advice on whether
> my site will benifit from the upgrade. I'm curious to know if a site that
> normally sees 300-500 users online would see any improvements.
>
> any on going issues? is php faster/slower? downsides? advantages? anything
> in general that can help me decide.

This study might help you make up your mind:

    http://ilia.ws/archives/32-Apache-1-vs-Apache-2-Performance.html

In summary: apache2 is faster for static content, but slower at serving
PHP; additionally, if using the prefork version of apache2 (which you
need to do to keep PHP stable), much of your performance boost for
static content will be lost. Your best bet: stick with apache1 if using
PHP heavily.

-- 
Matthew Weier O'Phinney           | mailto:matthew@xxxxxxxxxx
Webmaster and IT Specialist       | http://www.garden.org
National Gardening Association    | http://www.kidsgardening.com
802-863-5251 x156                 | http://nationalgardenmonth.org

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux