Re: PEAR performance/overhead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 7, 2004, at 12:34 PM, David Dickson wrote:

I was told that PEAR has too much overhead to be considered for a large scale site. Does any one feel the same? Is this an outrageous comment? I would like to hear comments from people who are using PEAR, or people who have considered PEAR but decided not to use it and your reasons.

The packages I am particularly interested in are HTML_QuickForm and DB.

I think that when most people say PEAR has big overhead they're referring to the parsing work that must be done. Under a plain PHP implementation it can be quite expensive to re-parse those two packages for every request. However, if you are concerned with performance on your site you should be using a compiler so that this does not occur. A php compiler will easily improve your site's performance by an order of magnitude.


-ryan

--
http://theryanking.com/blog

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux