I'm trying the example at: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop.constructor.php <?php class A { function A() { echo "I am the constructor of A.<br />\n"; } function B() { echo "I am a regular function named B in class A.<br />\n"; echo "I am not a constructor in A.<br />\n"; } } class B extends A { function C() { echo "I am a regular function.<br />\n"; } } // This will call B() as a constructor. $b = new B; ?> Running this on 4.3.9 both as an apache module and from CLI I get: I am a regular function named B in class A. I am not a constructor in A. This is contrary to what the manual says: "This is fixed in PHP 4 by modifying the rule to: 'A constructor is a function of the same name as the class it is being defined in.'. Thus in PHP 4, the class B would have no constructor function of its own and the constructor of the base class would have been called, printing 'I am the constructor of A.<br />'." Is this an error in the manual? Or a bug in php 4.3.9? Or just me being stupid? -- G W (no bush) ___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php