Re: performance: large includes vs small includes with lots of reads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You may find this useful: http://www.hudzilla.org/php/18_1_0.php

"Hans H. Anderson" <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0410071137410.28843-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'm trying to tweak my server a bit and wonder if it is better to have a
large
> include file, say 20-40 kb with 15 user-defined functions, of which maybe
3 or 4
> are used on any given page, or to have each function in it's own file and
> include (disk access/read) them only as needed.
>
> Is it faster/more efficient to read one large file or several smaller
ones?
> It's a RS Linux server with a gig of memory.
>
> I'm also looking at PHP Accelerator and such.  Do those store only in
memory
> what the script needs, or does it include all that you require or include
in, as
> well?
>
> Thanks,
> Hans

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux