Thanks for the comment, Yoram. I thought there might be a question about processing so I posted a straight, untouched scan of the Kodachrome slide:
Here it is after I processed it:
Just a little detail extraction ;-) I thought it looked like a painting on the Kodachrome so I just exaggerated that look a little.
Thanks,
Tina
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 2:01 PM, YGelmanPhoto <ygelmanphoto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The PhotoForum members' gallery/exhibit space was updated with new photographs on 20 MAY, 2017. Authors with work now on display at: http://www.davidhazy.org/andpph/gallery.html include. . .A few observations on this week's gallery . . .Tina Manley - Street Scene : Lovely image, but I'm having a hard time deciding if it has been post-processed to have "painterly" effects or not. Or maybe I shouldn't care about that.
John Retallack - : Natural lighting is my favorite, with a nice effect here -- except that the catchlight in her eyes, probably coming from the same window providing the light, destroys the grace that the eyes would evoke to match the rest of the image. To me, a catchlight should be a glint, an accent, not a blot.Jim Snarski - Elegance : What begins to be a very good shot is messed up by the tree line cutting through in back of the bird.
