And still . . . each to one's own.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Innovative? As in digital? I don’t regard much or any of your work shown here to be innovative. Or for that matter, anybody other than Andy’s experiments as being innovative.On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:09 PM, YGelmanPhoto <ygelmanphoto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'm sure there are others of us who have large archives, but what's the point of dragging out a few thousand oldies? I'd much rather see new work -- or old work that was really innovative at the time. Each to one's own, I guess.-yoram
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I have such a huge archive that I am sure I could put up a new image every day for the rest of the decade. But I don’t want to be a hog. Maybe I can do so and really piss off Andrew.
