This is too bad. I have thought about leaving the list myself, but it is not because of him; it is because of two other fellows. I leave it to you to decide who those individuals are, but suffice it to say that for the last 6 months, I have had an email filter deleting any email from them. I have not been bothered by Chris' ramblings to have a filter for him, but I certainly could. Those other individual's postings are far more insulting and damaging to the camaraderie on the list than any of Chris' postings. Andrew On 11/7/15 8:43 AM, Andrew Davidhazy wrote: > 9 subscribers departed from the list today as a result of Christopher Strevens’ posts. > > List participation is, in my opinion, affected by patently off-topic and disruptive messages. > The list was established to serve as a communications venue for the friendly exchange of > information. comments and hints, etc. related to photography and its practice. > > While it is recognized that it is easy enough to delete troublesome messages it would > help the overall effectiveness of the list if one did not have to do that. Same for blocking > messages from a particular individual. OTOH, he could be blocked from the list. > > We have discussed “censorship” in the past and the general consensus was that we should > not engage in this practice. It is disappointing, however, when members decide they’d rather > leave than have to deal with stuff such what Christopher Strevens has posted recently and > also in the past. > > Andrew Davidhazy > PF list coordinator >
