1) People have scattered to many places. Even the calendar for art in my local area allows one to have a free gallery of pictures online. Perhaps we should spread the word to photo clubs etc that one can post one picture a week and perhaps get a different point of view about the pictures.
2)We knew much more about wet photography than we know about digital. There are only a few really tech savvy people on this list for digital stuff. (Also there are those among us like me who never learned to type efficiently)
Roy
I remember when the list first started there was always lots of discussion about chemistry formulations /modifications, developer/film combinations, darkroom technique, etc. I’m not saying there isn’t enough to discuss about digital, but it just doesn’t seem to have that whatever (can’t find the way to say what I’m thinking about here) as film did or still has.
-----Original Message-----
From: P. David Van Verst <prolab@xxxxxxx>
To: PhotoForum educational network <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Oct 3, 2015 11:51 am
Subject: Re: Last minute PF gallery additions?
From: P. David Van Verst <prolab@xxxxxxx>
To: PhotoForum educational network <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, Oct 3, 2015 11:51 am
Subject: Re: Last minute PF gallery additions?
> On Oct 3, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > ………..But besides feedback, general discussion or communications using this list has also experienced a significant decline. Sometimes I think it is maybe time to discontinue the list. Maybe there was more to discuss in the silver age than in the digital age. Think you’re right Andy. I remember when the list first started there was always lots of discussion about chemistry formulations /modifications, developer/film combinations, darkroom technique, etc. I’m not saying there isn’t enough to discuss about digital, but it just doesn’t seem to have that whatever (can’t find the way to say what I’m thinking about here) as film did or still has. I know I would rather be creating in the darkroom than sitting in front of a monitor, at least most of the time. Just one retired old geezer’s opinion. Cheers, Dave
