Re: Question on flash and power or intensity measurement.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is there reciprocity failure in sensors?
 
 
In a message dated 10/19/2013 10:11:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jan@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Did you do well in math? Can you explain how a 500 watt tungsten bulb can deliver the same light as a 500ws flash delivering light in 1/175th sec? 

Take one second and divide by 175 = and multiply the result by a big enough number to equal 500. Got it? That’s how many tungsten watts equal a 500 ws studio strobe.

   


On Oct 19, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Santa Fe Imaging wrote:

There are all kinds of mechanical and electronic considerations that come into play but it seems to me that a 500 watt tungsten lamp exposed for 1 second should give the same amount of light to the sensor/film as a single 500ws flash exposure.



On 10/19/2013 7:34 AM, Andrew Davidhazy wrote:
I think that something vexing is the fact that the electronic flash delivers its light over a short time while tungsten lamps can (or do) deliver it over a long time. If one compares them at the assumed duration of the flash then the tungsten bulb will come out the weaker of the two by far. But if you compare them during an exposure time of a second or a minute or more then the tungsten lamp wins. It seems to me anyway.

Andy from Rochester





Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Art for Cars: art4carz.com
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post

.



 

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux