LoL john. Its called a typo. Dont know if you have noticed I and o are next to each other. And In what way did I discount his work. I discounted you making a big deal about quantity. If thats your criteria I had at one point about 10,000 images all published at the same time. 250 per week for about 75 weeks all published non stop. Which is why I said I doubt Bill count his career by volume. In fact of the thousands of still images and paintings and movies I would only count a small portion as significant or important. I would dare say Bill might feel the same way.
Everyone knows he's a Times staffer, and is among the best street photographers ever. And his name is Bill, not Bob.On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
He does work for the Times. I mean he does have his own webpage on the times website that is just Bob's work.
http://www.nytimes.com/video/on-the-street/Quantity doesn't mean anything. I don't think Bob would judge his accomplishments on Volume. I hope not. He has a long distinguished career.
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/.
Whoa! I resumed my reading of the Sunday Times, and lo and behold there are MORE of Bill's photos. Twenty eight more. On page 16, entitled "Evening Hours". This guy is a ball of fire!!!
