You singled out a quite specialized field of photography where Photoshop fixes don’t matter or - as Randy put it - “they get you fired”. So what is the relevance to the overall picture? The two statements still stand tall: 1. Almost everything we are looking today (= still photography) has been Photoshopped. 2. S&%$ in - S&%$ out (never mind #1). Klaus On Mar 11, 2014, at 12:09 AM, David Dyer-Bennet <dd-b@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2014-03-10 21:53, Klaus Knuth wrote: >> I haven’t had the chance, but my guess is if I would ask a group of not so amateur sports photographers using their Canon 1Dx or Nikon D4 in “spray and pray mode”, they would certainly not be concerned about Photoshop fixes. They are not supposed to either if they work for a paper or a magazine, trying to maintain its documentary public image. They just hope that one of those 1000+ frames turns out to be a winner. > > Yes, and I was responding to a claim that "digital photographers by and > large" do believe that. So it seems a *very* relevant data point, to me. > -- > David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/ > Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ > Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ > Dragaera: http://dragaera.info Nikon DSLR photo list: > http://d4scussion.com >
