Can we change the context without changing the content?
If so, is content the true nature of the “photograph” and the context the
interpretation of the image?
Gregory
From: Randy Little
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: Photoshopping Ist Verboten!!! Not like the fence post that was missing from the kent stateimage
or the zillion other pj image there where retouched should have had it
done. But Don't these guys learn? So many have been fired in the
past 10 years for this stuff. I would argue hugely that its the
difference between a photograph and a photoshopped image. They are
more covering their asses legally for something that small. I guarntee every
image you see on a news site has has significant post processing in some form or
another. He should have just said I can burn that in so you can't see it
in the dark room . cause thats still and everyday event.
Notice something different? The right one was used for nearly 2
decades. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/08/22/weekinreview/29701999.JPG
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Bob <w8imo@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
|