Re: Boneyards photo ops

[wpettit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

I can imagine a live nose art series...  could do it in Photoshop, but that wouldn't see quite right.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Faul
Sent: Nov 17, 2013 6:28 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: Boneyards photo ops

Posing a nude in the ‘cockpit’ of a B-52 could be a double entendre ,and so could posing a nude astride a cigar shaped wing or drop tank. I asked about shooting nudes at AMARC and all I got was a stern look from the female PR officer. The NTS dodged around behind the radioactivity issue, but AMARC did not appreciate my wish to pose a nude atop their collection of 50 DC-9 tails (don’t ask). I could title it “51 Tails”.

On Nov 17, 2013, at 6:12 PM, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote:

Grammar corrected post.

 

In a message dated 11/17/2013 6:02:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx writes:

Russ's point is what meaning does the setting have to nude? Does adding a nude to some aircrafts in the background add some meaning to the nude that is something different than a nude shot in a studio or in the model's house/living space? There has to be someway the environment of the shoot creates a new meaning or add an artistic feature.   Just shooting a nude in a deserted factory does not automatically create new meaning.

 

Roy

 

Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints

------

Art for Cars: art4carz.com

Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com

Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com

Camera Works - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/battlefieldparks/front_qt.htm

ArtNet: http://www.artnet.com/artists/jan+w.-faul/

.