Re: Boneyards photo ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I can imagine a live nose art series...  could do it in Photoshop, but that wouldn't see quite right.

Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Faul
Sent: Nov 17, 2013 6:28 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: Boneyards photo ops


Posing a nude in the ‘cockpit’ of a B-52 could be a double entendre ,and so could posing a nude astride a cigar shaped wing or drop tank. I asked about shooting nudes at AMARC and all I got was a stern look from the female PR officer. The NTS dodged around behind the radioactivity issue, but AMARC did not appreciate my wish to pose a nude atop their collection of 50 DC-9 tails (don’t ask). I could title it “51 Tails”.



On Nov 17, 2013, at 6:12 PM, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote:

Grammar corrected post.
 
In a message dated 11/17/2013 6:02:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx writes:
Russ's point is what meaning does the setting have to nude? Does adding a nude to some aircrafts in the background add some meaning to the nude that is something different than a nude shot in a studio or in the model's house/living space? There has to be someway the environment of the shoot creates a new meaning or add an artistic feature.   Just shooting a nude in a deserted factory does not automatically create new meaning.
 
Roy
 


Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Art for Cars: art4carz.com
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post

.






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux