Portra isnt that bad I shoot portra 160 at 125 and its very nice flat because its designed for scanning and retouching.
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
-------- Original message --------
From: Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11/13/2013 6:24 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OH GOD JAN DON:T SAY ANYTHING :-D
It’s scanned on a Kodak/Creo/Scietex and run through their spotting and dust elimination software. It’s still better than digital unless of course you like flat tones and soft details. Good thing they didn’t pick a really good film, as Portra 160 is crap. NOt that I am God, but I haven’t shot a roll of it in a decade and many of my peers hate it too.
On Nov 13, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Randy Little wrote:
interesting no? obviously off a good scanner.
Art Faul
The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Art for Cars: art4carz.com
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post
.
