Re: ON JARGON: AN ILLUMINATING HISTORY OF SPECIALIST SPEECH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-10-26 17:37, Jan Faul wrote:
> 
> ON JARGON: AN ILLUMINATING HISTORY OF SPECIALIST SPEECH
> 
> by Brian Dillon

Sounds like a fascinating book, maybe I'll find time to read it.

And this looks like a good opportunity to quote James Nicoll on the
"purity" of the English language:

The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that
English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow
words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways
to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.

(Back to me)

There are areas of English where we have four terms for something,
derived from the Anglo-Saxon, the Norman French, the Greek, and the Latin.

"Jargon" is mostly these days taken to mean specialized, probably
technical, terminology.  I'm a computer programmer and a science fiction
fan, which puts me squarely at the source of a lot of the more annoying
jargon of the late 20th and early 21st centuries -- we've been busily
inventing so much new stuff, we needed ways to talk about it.  (The old
jargon.txt file from the ARPAnet, later expanded and published as The
Hacker's Dictionary, shows how strongly SF fandom's jargon influenced
computer jargon.)

-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info     Nikon DSLR photo list:
http://d4scussion.com





[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux