Re: ilford positive paper

[Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

For my money, I would shoot Tri-X. At f288, you’re looking at some very long exposures even with Tri-X. Their direct positive is very slow by comparison. I haven’t used it in some time but I think it ah an ISO of 8.

On Sep 1, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Randy Little wrote:

Yes Jan ilford (Harman) paper for like 35 years (I loved Kodak fineart :-(     )  but I have never used the direct positive  and I would love to stick that in my 8x10 wisner or even the Harman titan 8x10 Pen hole camera.   But is is any good and what is its behavior like?   Dlog curve Dmax dmin extra.   I;m sure I will try some when I get done with this stupid movie but if anyone has experience with it.  

Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Inkjet or darkroom? Their darkroom papers are great and their inkjet papers are too. I normally do not print on Epson, but use Ilford.

On Sep 1, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Randy Little wrote:

Has anyone used the ilford positive papers?   

Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/

Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints

------

Art for Cars: art4carz.com

Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com

Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com

Camera Works - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/battlefieldparks/front_qt.htm

ArtNet: http://www.artnet.com/artists/jan+w.-faul/

.

Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints

------

Art for Cars: art4carz.com

Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com

Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com

Camera Works - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/battlefieldparks/front_qt.htm

ArtNet: http://www.artnet.com/artists/jan+w.-faul/

.