You have to take dxo with. Big grain of salt. The methods are pseudoish
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 08/28/2013 6:32 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: jpg
How helpful!
Andrew
On Wed, August 28, 2013 6:17 pm, Jan Faul wrote:
>
> I’m just blowing smoke in your ear. I don’t shoot digital for a reason
> and it’s what we’re discussing now.
>
> On Aug 28, 2013, at 9:08 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
>
>> On 2013-08-28 17:00, Jan Faul wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Those who know have told me the only digital holding more than 5
>>> stops are the $50k chips on the Phase One, Mamiya 645 and Hassie.
>>
>> That's just wrong. Wildly, hugely, wrong. The DxOMark sensor scores
>> measure the Nikon D800, for example, at 14.5 stops exposure range. Ctein
>> measured my Nikon D200 at better than 10 stops.
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/
>> Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
>> Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
>> Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
>>
>>
>
>
> Art Faul
>
>
> The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
> ------
> Art for Cars: art4carz.com
> Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
> Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com
> Camera Works - The Washington Post
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/battlefieldparks/front_qt.htm
> ArtNet: http://www.artnet.com/artists/jan+w.-faul/
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
