It’s not a weird flashing process. It’s the same or almost the same as reversing E-3.
On Jul 11, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Randy Little wrote: It requires weird light source flashing process I thought which is why there was never mass kodachrome labs.
On Jul 11, 2013 8:51 AM, "Jan Faul" < jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Email does not do humor very easily. One does not get any inflections on our speech, so today there is precious little humor in which is not just dry.
I thought Kodak or somebody still had available chemistry for Kodachrome. If you want to develop b/w, there are easier films to work with.
On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Bob wrote:
I didn't know about the B&W processing. I thought all
Kodachrome processing was gone. Thanks. Maybe some day I'll
thaw it and see what happens.
One of the bad parts about not communicating via the
spoken word. The tone of a message can't come across....
I was trying for some humor...... 8^)
Bob
-Money can't buy happiness--- But
somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.
Buy the lottery ticket in black and white. Kodachrome can
now only be processed as B&W as the lab in Parson, KS shut
down the Kodachrome processing a good while back.
Roy
-----Original Message----
Art Faul
The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Camera Works - The Washington Post
.
Art Faul
The Artist Formerly Known as Prints ------ Camera Works - The Washington Post
.
|
