Re: Keeping images safe Was: golden age layoffs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jun 14, 2013, at 7:22 AM, YGelmanPhoto wrote:

With all this talk about storage disasters and with unreadable data due to advanced hardware (and software?), I'm beginning to think that I have to print every image I want to save.  Of course, that includes printing negatives as well so I'll still be able to print positives the old fashioned way. 

So, does anyone have good info on longevity of transparencies?  Most of my images are black/white, so I'm mostly interested in black/white negatives.

Not that I would use my information as a guideline, but I have glass negatives made by my great-grandfather in the 1880’s to 1915. You can see prints from them on fineartamerica.com under my name in the Pre-WW1 section 

I also have Kodachromes made by my father from 1945-1963 and they are fine. He shot with a Leica, Retina IIa, and Nikon S and I just wish he had learned to use a tripod a bit earlier. He had a really nice aluminum Star-D which mostly hung on the wall of his office.

Personally I think you are overreacting. I have a dozen or so HD’s which start up whenever I want, to say nothing of hundreds of CD’s and DVD’s. I accessed a CD from 1995 yesterday. Every time I fill up a drive I put it on the shelf in my vault in a Tupperware box as backup. So far there are eight. If you think there is a good brand to avoid, I think that is fiction. They all break down. My most consistent drives are from LaCie, but also WD is good and so is Hitachi. I have just had two G-Raid drives fails with about 6TB of files and that’s not every funny. 


Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post
art for cars: panowraps.com
.






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux