Re: digital art issues.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




When I started using Photoshop 2.5 (pre-CS anything) there was no such thing as smart filters, and in fact I don’t recall there was smart anything other than people who even knew about the software. Smart users didn’t use PC’s for it.


On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:38 PM, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote:

When I started using Photoshop CS3 I noticed that Windows XP couldn't read the psd  files that had smart filter layers in them and thus Windows could not copy them when I was doing back up. I stopped using smart filter layers. The problem will really come to the fore when psd becomes completely incompatible with the Windows OS'
Roy
 
 
"For a generation, institutions from the Museum of Modern Art in New York to the Pompidou Center in Paris have been collecting digital art. But in trying to restore the Davis work, which was finally debugged and reposted at the end of May, the Whitney encountered what many exhibitors, collectors and artists are also discovering: the 1s and 0s of digital art degrade far more rapidly than traditional visual art does, and the demands of upkeep are much higher. Nor is the way forward clear. In a message dated 6/11/2013 6:47:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx writes:"
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/10/arts/design/whitney-saves-douglas-daviss-first-collaborative-sentence.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&


 


Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post
art for cars: panowraps.com
.






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux