Nah not after seeing deer hunter as a kid. If you are trying to assess the danger evolved in taking that shot. Unless you where there in the car you don't know how it was done and what was involved in its creation. LIke maybe a rig or mount?
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:39 PM, <MichaelHughes7A@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you play Russian Roulette too?In a message dated 05/05/2013 00:21:41 GMT Daylight Time, randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx writes:Oh I would never text and drive. Or talk and drive. Photo and drive is a whole other thing. Its art and in art we must expand beyond the rules. :-D.From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
-------- Original message --------
From: Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/04/2013 5:03 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PF members exhibit on May 4, 2013
And folks think texting while driving is dangerous?
On May 4, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Randy Little wrote:
John that is just out side of Amarillo on the way to OK city.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:57 AM, John Palcewski <palcewski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Randy S. Little, On the road again. Love this multi-level image!
The flat horizon reminds me of my days long, long ago in Amarillo, TX.
The yellow bins suggest garbage on parade or something. The mirror
has both a "normal" and wide-angle view of what's coming from behind.
All this combines to create a great sense of movement, and perhaps
some danger. The photographer is risking his life to get a shot!
Haven't we all, at one time or another, just failed to resist grabbing
the camera and shooting as we're trying to keep our car on the road?
Great image.
Bob McCulloch, Grape Hyacinth. After all the movement and potential
violence from the pic previous, here's some of nature's passivity.
Not much is going on.
Dan Mitchell, Hataway. Cartier-Bresson said your eye must see a
composition or an _expression_ that life itself offers you, and you must
know with intuition when to click the camera. I can't decide if this
is the result of said intuition, or mere chance. In any event, I
don't see much that's decisive.
Art Faul, What's wrong with this picture? I think the white caption
material at the bottom, complete with copyright symbol, is a major
distraction. Also, something tells me that the image wasn't really
shot at 1/60 @ f4, but rather at 1/30 @f5.6. I can't prove it, but
that's what my gut tells me.
art for cars: panowraps.com
Art FaulThe Artist Formerly Known as Prints------Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.comGreens: http://www.inkjetprince.comCamera Works - The Washington Post.
