On 2013-03-17 22:35, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote:
In a message dated 3/17/2013 3:21:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dd-b@xxxxxxxx writes:
For purposes of discussion here I like to know that sort of thing. For evaluating the image as art, it's of mild tangential interest to me. If you'd painted it in that detail instead, what difference would that make to me? All the really obvious differences involve using it as something other than art (like "I should go see that for myself").
For juried shows juried by a photographer pictures which they see as manipulated in Photoshop get kicked right on out- even if they pictures are straight shots.
Perhaps so, but that just means that saying you did or didn't do much manipulation doesn't affect the outcome; kind of tangential to where we are I think.
-- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
