Re: comments on Anti Aliasing filterless design ?

[Pablo Coronel <pablo.coronel.70@xxxxxxxxx>]

I guess both sensors and software have improved to the point where "jagging" is minimal, and anti aliasing has become unnecessary...
but of course a good chunk of marketing blah blah will come with that

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:09 AM, RsLittle <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

They can get ride of the aa filter because of new and better de misaic algorithms.   The will still moire under many circumstances. 

>From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.

-------- Original message --------
From: Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03/04/2013 7:06 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: comments on Anti Aliasing filterless design ?


I have both and disagree; however, the Leica MM - Monochrom - beats them both for detail. It's phenomenal.

Tina

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:50 AM, John Gulliver <j.gulliver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Some say the M8 still renders ultimately better detail than the M9 because of the lack of AA filter and despite being a smaller sensor.

On 4 March 2013 14:26, Trevor Cunningham <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm wondering this myself.

On 3/4/13 5:16 PM, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote:

Nikon put out the D800 E and Pentax put out the K-5 IIs. Pentax say
"Anti Aliasing filterless design achieves superior resolution for rich, detailed imagery at supreme resolution"
If this is so good why do previous digital cameras come out _with_ anti aliasing filter and why can one get away _without_ the filter now?
Roy

--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com