Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:45 PM, James Schenken <jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, the image gets constructed by an image sensor that appears to have 1 mm pixels. At least that seems to be the resolution. The sensor is a large flat plate.James
Sent from David's iPadIsn't that more depth and time slicing of whole exposures like an MRI?
Randy S. Little
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:01 PM, James Schenken <jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Andy
Curious you should ask. That is exactly how a nuclear scanner for medical scanning works.
It's interesting to watch the development of he image of one's innards on the display.
I just had such a scan and was able to watch the process unfold.
Cheers,
James
Sent from David's iPad
On Sep 25, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyone know of a camera that displays what it records cumulatively? By this I mean that the recording process would be tied to the display in real time and one could "see" the decrease in density on the display as it goes from total underexposure and gradually build up to some leve of exposure which is then terminated either by the camera or by the photographer.
>
> So one would not choose for example and exposure time but would watch the display and when it showed a sufficient amount of detail/information etc. one then would stop further accumulation of "signal".
>
> I am not sure where this would have an application but I guess there would be some somewhere. Can anyone? Is this feasible?
>
> Just blue skying ...
>
> Andy from Rochester
