Capture a...
* moment
* lighting bug
* flag
* fugitive
* the neighbor's dog and remember your dreams.
I'm with Jan, I take/make pictures...although now, I do prefer to say I
engage in a post-production workflow.
On 9/13/12 5:01 PM, Christopher Strevens wrote:
I think I called it image capture first. Sorry! Fine art is image
capture really with a person as the capture device. The main
difference is the fidelity of the image.
Sent from my Windows Phone
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jan Faul
Sent: 13/09/2012 14:14
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: Analog shmanalog
I don’t believe that we 'analog people’ capture anything. I was
raised as a maker and taker, and ‘capruing’ an image didn’t come
along until political correctness came along.
Jan
On Sep 12, 2012, at 11:35 PM, YGelmanPhoto wrote:
All this says is that digital capture and analog capture may have
different results, but I've never seen a comparison of the same scene
between the two methods created by the same (expert) person. I'll bet
such a comparison even then will not settle the question.
Most of the arguments are made by devout believers of one system or
the other. . . after all, why should they change their opinion?
-yoram
On Sep 12, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Randy Little wrote:
while great images can be made on both there are very
distinguishable visual difference between film and digital. Digital
will always capture in a linear fashion and thus high lights and
shadows will always have a different feel then a photo chemical
process. While shadow quality might improve over the next decade.
Hight lights in Digital will be an issue for a while. HDRI capture
can get them but they for sure don't feel like film.
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com/>
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
[some deleted text]
On Sep 12, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Herschel Mair wrote:
analog shmanalog... a great image is a great image.
Jan you have some great images and the process you chose to
make them is interesting but secondary.
Great pics are made by photographers not cameras. Nobody
asks the restaurant manager what kind of stove the chef
uses...
If I find digital more inspiring than film, then who's to
argue with that? And Vice versa. The process that the
artist used is as interesting as it contributed to the art.
Herschel Mair Photographer and Retoucher Santa Fe NM 505
695 8450 <tel:505%20695%208450>
Art Faul
The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/battlefieldparks/front_qt.htm
ArtNet: http://www.artnet.com/artists/jan+w.-faul/
http://www.artiqueunderground.com/artist/69.
