Actually, I do the same. I far prefer to do it in-camera, but if it cannot be done in-camera (or wasn't, for whatever reason), I am certainly not against doing it in post. But fixing a poor image is definitely less interesting to me than working on an image that was closer to what I have originally envisioned. Andrew On Mon, August 15, 2011 12:46 pm, Herschel Mair wrote: > ahhh... Andrew, the photographic fundamentalist! ...lest we lose a slither > of original vision. Perfectionists are a vanishing species... craftsmen > and women who care for every mm of picture area. Me... I crop away with > impunity, clone in missing parts, drop in a new sky, take out an > obstructive car.... align lines and change angles... What a rule-less, > even godless infidel I am. No respect for the medium in my photographic > barbarism- tearing at the heart of the art and forcing it into servitude. > Bending it's will to my own. In the end, it's > only purpose is to fulfill MY vision. Whatever it takes! > > Herschel > > > On 8/15/11 1:05 PM, asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> And be forced to crop the edges of the photograph? No thanks; I'd >> rather have it right in camera. >> >> Andrew >> >> >> > >
