Emily I agree ... about FB or somewhere equally accessible. AND - unlike web pages - anyone involved can add thier contributions. As far as anthing is permanent these days. I'll try to upload higher res versions than needed. For vagabond (the only camera I physically have) the scans more than do justice to the negatives. For the other cameras ... I only have what I was sent and cant remember how good that was until I look. As you say - once they are on FB anybody can archive them locally ... Rob >----Original Message---- >From: elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Date: 19/07/2011 13:50 >To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subj: Re: Jan Faul is Alive and Well > >Well, Rob, in my opinion possibly the best place for that data is now >the FB page. At least it would all be in one place and a place which >gives access to those outside FB as well as within. My hunch is that >FB will be pretty stable until power shortages hit the West. > >In any case, Andy and any one of us can then archive the PTC stuff if >we're nervous about durability. > >How much of the original film have you got? How good were the scans >you made? Can you just resave them larger? Or do you need to rescan? > >And is there some place not related to an individual on Photoforum >(like Andy) who might be the better caretaker of the original >materials? >-- >Emily L. Ferguson >mailto:elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >508-563-6822 >New England landscapes, wooden boats and races >http://www.landsedgephoto.com >Check out my Spring daily photograph project at: >http://tinyurl.com/3a6m7g6 >And Summer: >http://tinyurl.com/22juo5s >Autumn now complete here: >http://tinyurl.com/26pdgz9 >Winter concluded here: >http://tinyurl.com/2co5wkg > >
