-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re:
making a pinhole
From: Tim Corio <
tcorio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
Mon, February 07, 2011 8:17 am
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators -
Professionals - Students
<
photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I
played with this a few years ago using my Canon 5D. I cut a large
hole in
a body cap and glued a paper towel tube (painted black on the
inside) to
that. Glued a cardboard disk to the end with a small
(quarter inch) hole.
I painted the whole outside black in several
layers to fill in a few
small light leaks.
Over the hole in the end of the tube I taped a
piece of aluminum foil.
In that foil I poked a small hole using a
pin.
This gave pretty good results. I could not get a clean hole.
Small
defects in the hole scattered light reducing contrast.
Body
caps are cheap on eBay and the rest of the material is nearly free.
You
can experiment a lot for little cost.
Tim
On Sun, 2011-02-06
at 21:43 -0600, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> On 2011-02-06 16:20,
mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> > Came up with an idea. Toyed with the idea of trying some
pinhole
> > photography but something always seems to get in the
way. Came up with
> > an idea to turn a regular film/digital camera
into a pinhole using a
> > body cap. Should work on any 35mm
digital ect that would accept that
> > kind of cap, and an extra
cap in the bag weighs next to nothing and no
> > bulk or extra
stuff to lug around.
>
> Would you be shocked to learn they're
commercially available? I have
> one for my Nikon bodies. I've done a
tiny bit with it on digital; I
> should try it on the D700, which
should be a bit better than the DX
> cameras; a bit.
>
>
> Now I suspect the smaller the hole the better as far as sharpness,
but
> > is there a group of sizes that I should try? How much of a
difference
> > in hole size should I allow. Granted a body cap
isn't going to alter
> > the GDP, but its not like getting another
piece of cardboard either. Id
> > be interested to hear thoughts
and ideas of those with pinhole
> > experience.
>
>
For sharpness, there's an optimal hole size (depends on distance from
> sensor), and either bigger or smaller loses you resolution. For
> 35mm-size cameras, going for sharpness is a mugs game, though; you
don't
> get sharp pinhole photography from that small a neg.
>
> (Lots of easy online resources on hold size.)
>