On Tue, November 17, 2009 16:22, Edwin Blenkinsopp wrote: > 120 in/sec? Show your work! How do you expect to get partial credit if you don't give anything but the final answer? :-) I think mine works out to 60 in/sec (I hadn't paid attention to the given size of the object in my original submission); so at least one of us is wrong :-). -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
