Guy, Congratulation on your up-coming "Metropolis" show. Negative pan images are great idea. How about more details about the prints? Would love to see it. Any chance on the web? I started life as a square but turned pan. My folks were just sick about it. AZ Build a 120/35mm Lookaround! The Lookaround Book. Now an E-book. http://www.panoramacamera.us > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [SPAM] Square vs rectangular vision - was Re: Long digital > exposures? > From: Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, November 20, 2008 3:04 pm > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students > <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Emily L. Ferguson said: > "He sees in squares anyway... > What an interesting comment. I've got the Mont St-Michel book and the prime > reason I bought it is that the composition (plus a lot of other features in > the photographs, of course) is nothing like other books on the Mont > St-Michel. > I wonder how many members of this group also see in square. How many see > vertically. Personally, perhaps because my vision tends to work in such a > way, I see horizontal and - more and more so - panoramic. But I also have > a fascination for well a articulated square vision. Square is more difficult > to shoot than the 24x36 format but, in my own view, it can yield much more > powerful images. > Anybody has views on square vs rectangular, horizontal vs vertical? > Guy > 2008/11/20 > > > > It's fun, doing the research for a project like this, but at a certain > > point it's time to just go out and do it yourself. > > > > If Kenna is shooting digitally he's not using a 35mm digi. He sees in > > squares anyway, and makes beaucoup bucks. > > -- > > Emily L. Ferguson > > mailto:elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > 508-563-6822 > > New England landscapes, wooden boats and races > > http://www.landsedgephoto.com > > http://e-and-s.instaproofs.com/ > > > >
