Re: Greenberg v. National Geographic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In a message dated 7/4/2008 10:20:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200516964.ENB.pdf
I get a blank box when clicking on this but I searched the decisions and it is a little bit more complicated as the origanal three assignment granted NG the right to republish but later on Greenburg asked for and got the copyrights returned. This being the case unless the photographers asked for the copyrights back most of the earlier NG magazines probably can still be published electronicly
Roy
 
From the Court
Photographs from the first three assignments were published in the January 1962,
February 1968, and May 1971 issues of the Magazine, respectively. The terms of Greenberg's employment
for these assignments were set out in a series of relatively informal letters. Greenberg received compensation
consisting of a daily fee, a fee based on the number of photographs published, and payment of expenses, and
in return the Society acquired all rights in any photograph taken on the jobs that was ultimately selected for
publication in the Magazine. In 1985, at Greenberg's request, the Society reassigned its copyrights in the
pictures from these three jobs back to Greenberg. Greenberg's fourth hire for the Society appeared in the July
1990 issue of the Magazine, but the agreement for this job was more detailed than its predecessors. The
principle terms of the fourth agreement were similar to those of the first three; however, in this agreement
it was explicitly provided that all rights that the Society acquired in the photographs from the job would be
returned to Greenberg 60 days after the pictures were published in the Magazine..




Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux