----- Original Message ----- From: "trevor cunningham" <tr_cunningham@xxxxxxxxx> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:49 Subject: Re: mamiya 645 lenses and laziness : My math is starting from the 645 film frame with a : 75mm diagonal, not the 35mm diagonal. The 35mm mamiya : lens is the equivalent of a 16mm lens for 35mm format. : With the 1.5 ratio, that would be a 24mm lens on the : d200? Out and out, the lens IS a fisheye, or at least : close to one. The same math would make the 80mm : mamiya lens a 56mm lens on the d200, still a normal : lens, not a tele. Other than auto features, i'm : wondering if i'm losing anything. I do like my mamiya : glass and have invested some cash into it. ANDY?! : best to look here: http://photoweasel.diaryland.com/magratio.html
