RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] Re: Truth in Phoyo Journalism (?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks.

Cute…I assuming you’re joking; but actually, you might be onto something there…

 


From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:01 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] Re: Truth in Phoyo Journalism (?)

 

Paul,

Great story.

 

Now PS accomplishes the same with the Bazoom plug-in.  Or is that an action?

AZ


Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
The Lookaround Book.
Now an E-book.
http://www.panoramacamera.us




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] Re: Truth in Phoyo Journalism  (?)
From: Paul Weyn <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, April 17, 2007 2:27 pm
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


This subject is an interesting topic.

 

My wife used to be a cheerleader for the Phoenix Giants, a college ball team. This was in the 80’s before Photoshop, but when the team poster was printed, the girls were surprised to find their boobs all appeared to be a little bigger. The photographer had airbrushed in a faint shadow, giving the appearance of more cleavage. No doubt a liberty was taken but no one seemed to mind that “the truth” was altered slightly...

 

PW


From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:14 AM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: RE: [SPAM] Re: Truth in Phoyo Journalism (?)

 

Karl,

 

"Journalism, whether by using words or pictures, must be an accurate
representation of the truth," Royhab wrote.

 

I don't see a problem with that until someone insists that an un-altered photo is more truthful. The whole point of messing with an image is to make it tell the story better. Going way back into photo journalism history photos were frequently fixied up for technical or layout reasons. You would see few un-altered, i.e retouched, collaged, cropped images in an old newspaper photo archive. Going further to remove things and people not deemed important to the story was common.  Before and after versions of pictures are often strikingly different. There's a book about NYT photos - or newspapers in general - that illustrates all this. 

 

Photos are just a small piece of the picture - pun intended.  

 

AZ

 

 

Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
The Lookaround Book.
Now an E-book.
http://www.panoramacamera.us






-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Truth in Phoyo Journalism  (?)
From: karl shah-jenner <shahjen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, April 17, 2007 5:09 am
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Bob posts:
 
 
: This was in this morning's (16 April 2007) issue of The Cleveland Plain
: Dealer,  one of the area's daily newspapers. I found it interesting.
:
:
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/117672094448
040.xml&coll=2
 
 
"Journalism, whether by using words or pictures, must be an accurate
representation of the truth," Royhab wrote.
 
 
you know pictures aside, I find my eyebrows raising when I read this line
 
k
 
< 
 SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"> 
 
 
 
 
 

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux