RE: [SPAM] Calling all photo MacGyvers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
Robert,
 
I think it is certainly plausable that letters could be "read" using crude enlarging and some sort of statistical method whereby just few points on the letterform (like fingerprint ID - AFIS) could identify it. I'm thinking "CSI" and "Numbers" - too much TV!
 
http://www.jobinyvon.com/usadivisions/Forensic/afisfaqs.htm

Nice thing about fiction is you let the reader fill in the "realness" of the proposition without the boring details.  I would think crime novel fans are fairly sophisticated about police procedure stuff. 
 
AZ

Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
The Lookaround Book.
Now an E-book.
http://www.panoramacamera.us




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [SPAM] Calling all photo MacGyvers
From: Robert Earnest <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, April 13, 2007 8:17 pm
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

A friend of mine is writing a book and one of the plot twists involves
using
technology to "recover?" information from a 4x6 prints found at a crime
scene.

Here is what she wrote. I had an idea but I thought it would be really
fuun
to pose this challenge to you guys. Any ideas, anyone?

>From her letter to me...

______________________________________________________


INFO:


A 4x6 snapshot, left at a crime scene, plays an important role in the
plot
of the book I'm writing. The book is set in Seattle. 

A tech at the SPD Police Photo Lab enlarges the snapshot.  

When the Protagonist-Detective sees the enlargement, he notices that are
some markings on a knife in the photo. The markings are too small,
however,
to make out. They could be symbols, initials, or simply decoration.   


NOTE: At this point, I can go for one of two scenarios:

The first scenario is simple, though not as interesting. I would not
need a
scientist's input for it though

The second scenario is more complex, but also more interesting,
'technology-wise'.   
(NOTE:  I can only use it though IF it's true that NASA scientists have
developed a superior method of enhancing photos, and they have advanced
software for doing this.  I need to know whether it's true that their
software can 'fill in' (or extrapolate) information that *isn't actually
there*.

NOTE:
In either scenario, I want to avoid writing a laughable CSI-type scene in
which the CSI tech 'magically' enlarges or enhances a very poor quality
photo (i.e. taken with a camera-phone or low end point-and shoot), to the
point where they are suddenly able to identify an object or person in the
photo ‹ even though the object or person wasn't in focus in the first
place.  





SIMPLE SCENARIO:
(Photography-wise, this scenario only works if the markings are 'in
focus',
but too tiny to make out.)   

The Protagonist-Detective sees the enlargement and notices there are
markings on a knife in the picture.  For plot reasons, I don't want the
Detective to go back to the Police Lab to have the photo enlarged.
Instead
(because it's the weekend), he takes the snapshot to a friend who is
computer /photography savvy (i.e. Photoshop whiz). She enlarges the
snapshot
again and he sees that the markings on the knife are initials.  
(Note: It's only on TV and in movies that Police Lab Techs are available
24/7.)      :)



COMPLEX SCENARIO:

The SPD Police Photo Lab Tech enlarges the snapshot. When the
Protagonist-Detective sees the enlargement, he notices that there are
markings on a knife in the picture. 

The Police Photo Lab Tech tells the Detective that if he enlarges the
photo
any further, it will begin 'losing detail rather than gaining it'.  He
points out that the markings are 'out of focus' and that it's
impossible for
anyone to either enlarge or enhance a a photo and magically obtain a
'clear'
image ‹ if the image is out of focus to begin with, or if part of the
information isn't there.  He cites a 'laughable' TV episode in which a
CSI
tech did that.  He then says he has heard though that NASA scientists
have
been able to do this, by using algorithms, and advanced software to
extrapolate the information.  (i.e. Hubble Telescope distortions? Other
space photography advancements?)

The frustrated Detective has a friend, who is a scientist at Microsoft in
Redmond/Seattle. The friend works for NASA in conjunction with
Microsoft. 
(I've been told that this is viable, that Microsoft and NASA do work
together on various projects.)  The friend is familiar with the
technology
NASA uses to enhance space photos,  and she has access to the advanced
software. The friend 'enhances' the photo for the Detective and they
can see
that the markings are initials.


COMMENTS?    ADVICE?

Thanks ya'll.


R




[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux