>If in fact a picture does tell 1000 words shouldn't we have to use all 1000 > >words in a blatheringly long e mail to describe our photos, or do we get >points for eliminating distracting elements which might (not) have been in >our photos? >Please clarify, I might need to change my nondescript description. Terry Please feel free to elaborate. There is indeed no penalty for using up to the maximum of 1000 words (including the half-dozen or so you used in the first post). A picture is worth a thousand words ... but not one word more. I take your point though, perhaps it should have been clearer. A description of a nicely composed picture of a key subject with an uncluttered background may itself not warrant the full 1000. Maybe people can use the spare to describe why they deserve to win? Lord Letch. ___________________________________________________________ Tiscali Broadband from 14.99 with free setup! http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/
