Re: 35 mm film. . . and beyond

To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 35 mm film. . . and beyond
From: Achal Pashine <achalpashine@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:58:54 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qwU5G2euIl+aJOJI2GpabctCuZxlhbZQaR7Av0dc81Pgu6Xk0prrhfTjVhS/nmZMe2sZLbgfL5GDhjTwmOlYtBsOp7TrDiu5nZln3gXWgwSE1Hd3rjdQtqLVYpSale7y5PHvHp/SjyTR5/vq55siO+f7qEtF073pBPr5529uycU=
In-reply-to: <003b01c55a45$196b1aa0$78185142@happyk3tyje1sc>
References: <BEAE3BFC.5B7AF%lsmith@lwsphoto.com> <003b01c55a45$196b1aa0$78185142@happyk3tyje1sc>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I was expecting Picasso on film
{;->

Marilyn

Oh, then you need a pinhole; try one from Zero Image.
Achal

References:
- Re: 35 mm film
  - From: Lawrence W. Smith
- Re: 35 mm film. . . and beyond
  - From: Marilyn