If it didn't start out as a photography then it shouldn't be in a photo gallery. However there is no indication that it wasn't based on a photo which brings up the real question. When photographs has morphed beyond a certain point that they can't be identified as photographs, are they still photographs or a new type of creation? In a message dated 2/15/05 2:14:01 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, andpph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: Just a thought - should images that have no connection to reality be shown in our photography gallery? andy
