RE: red/blue 3-d imagery (light question, not photography)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theory works ok, it is just not what really happens.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Gregory
Fraser
Sent: 07 May 2004 14:18
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: RE: red/blue 3-d imagery (light question, not photography)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hmm. Well, I found Plato's "Postulates" for Optics on p. 195
> of Richard
> Gregory's excellent tome "Mind in Science". Here are the first three:
>
> 1. The rays emitted by the eye travel in a straight line.
> 2. The figure enclosed by visual rays is a cone which has its apex at
> the eye and its base at the edge of the object looked at.
> 3. Objects on which the visual rays fall, are seen.
>
> Nuff sed?
>
> Brian Chandler

Are you saying these postulates are false? Vlad assured me that was sound
optical theory. We based the Pixelhacker II on these principals! Where's my
cattle prod and where's that son of a ....

Greg Fraser
http://users.imag.net/~lon2251/Gallery



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux