|
Hi, I
don’t know much about the weight part… Although,
I myself bought a Digital this [2003] December… And
all the thought and research that I put into it suggests that Canon is a better
choice in digital. I
am a Nikon fan; but, I bought the canon A70. My
options were Canon A70/Nikon Coolpix 3100. I
have not looked into Coolpix 2100 [2.0 MP] though… But
the thing is that if your friend is serious about his photos, Canon offers more
Control. Though
both 3100 & A70 are in the same price band & resolution [3.2 MP], Nikon
has more modes, whereas Canon offers Aperture and Shutter speed controls along
with the modes. The
picture quality is good to… [if you want, I can send you a few sample
pictures] Only
thing I have heard is that Nikon’s macro is a tad bit better. Also,
canon piece is rugged and fits the hand [Nikon is too small… depends
whether you like to have a grip to your cam :)] So,
if your friend is a “snapper”, 3100 suits him better [for it has
only programmed modes and is handy in size]; otherwise, I shall recommend A70. Anyway,
you better not buy a 2.0 MP now, markets are moving-on and 2.0MP is almost out…
Also,
a higher resolution wouldn’t hurt… if nothing, it will help you to
crop your images… [you cant blow-up negs here – digital :)] What
else, that’s as much as I know & my personal opinion. Hope
this is helpful :) Keep In Touch. With Regards, Paresh
Pandit Sunday, February 22, 2004 P.S.: If your budget allows, consider Canon Powershot A80 too…
cooler not only in terms of resolution [4.0 MP], but also other aspects such as
design and ‘control’… :) You
Wrote: From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marilyn You would think that by now, people who
know me would know I'm a poor candidate for information on digital
cameras, but I keep getting asked questions about them. I assure
those who ask the questions that I have contacts in high places (the PhotoForum
List) who know all {:-> The person asking is interested in a
digital camera, 2 mega pixels is all he thinks he needs - his photographs are
rarely over 4 X 6 inches. He has narrowed his choices to the Canon
A60, Canon A70 or the Nikon Cool Pix 2100, 2 (3?) mega pixels with macro
capabilities. He is concerned about the lens quality of
the Nikon, is wondering which is the more rugged camera and if the Canon
compares in weight to the Nikon (which is lighter?). He's also wondering if he may have missed
a super low to medium end camera that may be as good or better as the
three he is considering. Have
any of you experience or opinions on the above mentioned cameras?
Any input would be much appreciated. Thank you. Marilyn |
