I also agree with 2 Bobs. As to Peeter picture: I was surprised to see myself on the gallery tonight. Metadata - this is not concern to this image. maybe left from last week as the rest of the text: "All the night long the flock ...." It happened lately in a few cases. The right data is written at the beginning: " Details: TIME: September 2003 ". And.. this 1987 car can not be cleaned ! one can't get rid of the substantial rust, glass scratches etc' More of this - a few minutes before we were driving through some dirt roads. We were late because of a forestry lesson Peeter gave me, so at least it was not wasted. Thank you Peeter. Thank you Bob. _______________________ Pini Vollach http://www.pinimage.com > Peeter Vissak - The End > Dirty pictures? No, but for perfection you should have completely > valeted (cleaned) the car before staging this shot, especially the > windows. > OK, it wasn't supposed to be car-mag fare. it's a time of day / > moment. The twilight zone ... heck, even the horizon is level. > > This picture is about more than just the picture. The author is a > vagabond: so is the subject. It's about people who have shared the > same camera meeting in the flesh. > > Darn it - another shot I actually like a lot for one reason or > another. > > > > Just noticed the metadata: > <<TIME: 24. October 2003; 11:14>> > For clarity was this AM or PM? More confusing though: since Estonia > is in the Northern Hemisphere is why, if you had just missed the > sunset, it was 11:14. This time is confusing me ... easily done. > >
