Re: photographic exhibition in Harrogate UK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



will find out the postcode... changed opening date to monday 2nd june 4pm,
but work is up now.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris" <nimbo@ukonline.co.uk>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:32 AM
Subject: RE: photographic exhibition in Harrogate UK


> Please e-mail the postcode
>
> Chris
> http://www.chrisscrazyideas.co.uk
> http://www.chrissgallery.co.uk
>
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu
> |> [mailto:owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu]On Behalf Of Michael
> |> Ibbetson
> |> Sent: 28 May 2003 01:05
> |> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
> |> Subject: photographic exhibition in Harrogate UK
> |>
> |>
> |> The end of year exhibition by the final year HND students from
Harrogate
> |> college will be held at the Victoria Shopping Center Next week (for 2
> |> weeks). The Official opening is at 4pm on the 4th June, although
> |> work will
> |> be on display from the 30th May. So if you fancy a look, please go down
> |> there - and please forward your comments to me (cos some of my
> |> work will be
> |> there). cheers. Mike.
> |> ----- Original Message -----
> |> From: "Thomas Dall" <tdall@eso.org>
> |> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
> |> <photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu>
> |> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 4:10 PM
> |> Subject: gallery comments 27/5/03
> |>
> |>
> |> > My thoughts on the current exhibition at
> |> > http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery.html
> |> >
> |> > ------------------
> |> > Robin G. Ramos - Precious Pearl
> |> > A very sweet picture; Man (well, boy) and Nature united. The colors
are
> |> > wonderful and the composition is good. It might have been improved if
> |> > the boys head was fully in the frame. I wonder what kind of image you
> |> > could get if the hands were just covering the sun and not
> |> using flash...
> |> > equally dramatic perhaps, and quite different?
> |> >
> |> > Marilyn Dalrymple - Waiting for a Home
> |> > The story (your text) does not come out of the picture. I see a cat
> |> > looking out the window (looking for freedom, open spaces...?) in some
> |> > non appealing surroundings ("I want to get out of here"). I would
have
> |> > cropped a bit on the right, removing the cupboard (?) and making the
> |> > curtain extend out the image in both sides making it better balanced.
> |> > Your on-camera flash made a bright spot on the frame.
> |> >
> |> > Janine C. Hanson - St. Jerome with Fresco
> |> > That is well perceived! The statue seems to be acting in the
> |> fresco, and
> |> > yet he clearly does not belong there (he is blue). Very good
placement
> |> > of the hands "touching".  There is something with the balance
> |> - the left
> |> > part is troublesome... but of course the fresco painter never
intended
> |> > this view!
> |> >
> |> > Judy Curiel - Barn with two holes
> |> > Nice colors, but you would have got more saturation and better
> |> sharpness
> |> > by shooting from right in front of it (but maybe your own shadow
would
> |> > be falling on it then?) Now it seems a bit cluttered: the opening on
> |> > lower right, the oblique lines, the highlight reflections...
> |> >
> |> > Linda Wilson -
> |> > Nice movement, the fence and wall leading to the castle and -
> |> presumably
> |> > - on to the church. Anyway, there is some postcard-in-black-and-white
> |> > about it... like I cannot get the mood - it leaves me quite
> |> indifferent.
> |> > And it seems to be leaning a bit to the right, out of balance.
> |> >
> |> > Lea Murphy - Triangles
> |> > Triangles... but for geometrical abstraction I prefer a pose less
> |> > careless (the knee). The best triagle nude was made by Edward Weston,
> |> > and I can't help but compare... not fair, I know.
> |> >
> |> > Bob Talbot - Peacock
> |> > If you cut away the lower part (the ground) you have a very good
image.
> |> > The movement blur is nice! You would have had the perfect shot if the
> |> > background behind him had been all green grass...
> |> >
> |> > Gregory david Stempel - Pillows in the Sun
> |> > Cut the lower left speck of light and the upper black rectangle and
you
> |> > have a far better shot, with some very interesting light/dark
patterns
> |> > and interactions.
> |> >
> |> > King/Arthur - Eddy in His New Apartment
> |> > Well, nice backlighted plant, a window frame, wall opposite...oh,
> |> > there's a bird as well ;-)  It has a nice soft feeling to it, but the
> |> > right half of the image is essentially clutter.
> |> >
> |> > Dan Mitchell - Waiting
> |> > Streetshots... well, not my type of photo. Sorry. No clear idea (that
I
> |> > can grasp), no connection between the two men. I keep asking why?
> |> >
> |> > Rand Flory - Dinner
> |> > Looks nice, I get hungry... But nothing else to sustain my interest
in
> |> > the image. You could have tried to arrange patterns of food and shot
> |> > more from above. Or even much closer, focusing on a tomato leaving
> |> > everything else blurred. For example...
> |> >
> |> > Jim Davis - Coot Chicks
> |> > More birds Jim... ;-)  The highlights in the background annoys me. I
> |> > would have liked to see more of the flower too. Have you considered a
> |> > polarizer to take out reflections from vegetation and water?
> |> > -------------------
> |> >
> |> > That's it for this week. As always, it was a pleasure!
> |> >
> |> > Cheers,
> |> > Thomas
> |> >
> |>
> |>
> |>
>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux