Re: Nude

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Making good photographs of nude models is very hard.  It's easy to make picutres that flaunt sexuality, but they are not necessarily good art.
 
And as to male versus female models - I don't find photographing males all that more difficult than photographing females.  Actually, male subjects can be the basis for an entirely different genre of photograph - female subjects tend to be ideal for images that emphasize softness (through lighting or choice of setting/background), while male subjects are especially good in settings where the subliminal subject is either strength or textures.  Example - it seems natural to pose female models against soft window light, perhaps in a very high-key style, while male subjects might work better with machinery, or in juxtaposition with tree bark.
 
Louie

Gregory david Stempel wrote:

>A question for the audience: Why are photographers, after more than a
>hundred years of photography, still photographing nude women? And why do we
>still have this taboo about nude men? Are we truly artists when we allow our
>prejudices to interfere with our spirits?

I don't know  -  I'm scared of photographing people!  ;-)

Seriously, that might be part of the explanation; most (male)
photographers feel more comfortable in an "intimate" situation with a
woman than with a man, even though there is (or ought not to be) any
compromising intimacy involved in photographing somebody.

So... how do we overcome this taboo and become able to work as true
artists no matter what the subject is?  Or does this question make sense
at all? - I'm not sure.

Thomas

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux