Re: Shuttle images - what do _you_ see??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 11:52 AM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>If NASA had realized there was a problem there are many other hypothetical 
>alternatives like staying in orbit longer, going to the international space 
>station, sending up a another space shuttle or Russian rockets with empty 
>space escape pods like the one pod that is attached to the international 
>space station now for use in an emergency.  Solutions could have been found 
>if the problem had been detected. David Brown while in orbit did take 
>pictures of the left wing for some reason but didn't transmit them to earth 
>and of course they were lost with the ship. 
>
>In a message dated 2/8/03 9:57:33 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
>sgflack@prodigy.net writes:
>

Guys,

There was no way for the shuttle to change orbits to match the space
station. They had no gear that I am aware of to allow transfer to another
vehicle - rescue or otherwise. Had they any clue that the wing was damaged
they would not have come down. 

It is not difficult to imagine the psychological effect a disabled shuttle
with no hope for rescue or exploded orbiting debris and people would have. I
hope the science policy-makers consider this. 

RE the pictures - given that all other indications were that the problem was
with the left wing it seems reasonable to suspect that the smear visible in
the picture is not a digital artifact. Telemetry data from when the picture
was made 60 seconds or so before the break-up may indicate something.

AZ

Build a Lookaround!
The Lookaround Book.
http://www.panoramacamera.us



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux