Re: PF exhibits on 2002-08-0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2002-08-0

Greg Fraser - Badonkadonk Trust
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/fraser.html
I love this shot just as it is - full of atmosphere when in reality it
is just a rusty old bridge.

Bob Talbot: My only minor question was whether it worked not being able
to see
where all the uprights converged.
So I tried a minor crop to square (album cover format)
3 pixels off base and left: 57 off top, 9 off right

Nah, it becomes a different picture ;o)

Bobbie Blazy: Although my eye is led out at the top of the image it
snaps
right back into the flow.  I could look at this image a long time...the
tonal ranges, it is a thought provoking image to me.




Alan Zinn - Keats - Boston
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/zinn.html

Bob Talbot: Not a bad photo but I'm assuming this one was put in for
it's humo(u)r
content.
A thing of beauty?  Well, I bet his mum loves him anyway. ;o)

Bobbie Blazy: Thank goodness it is not the butt pants thing.....lol



Bruce Weitzman -
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/weitzman.html

Bob Talbot: Great shot - really nice quality.  Well lit, good tones.
Don't know what more to say really ... is there a minor flaw? I wonder
if the feature at pixel  64,247 is a reflection of the white panels
used to throw light back?
I don't know - as a shot it has no real focus other than that sweeping
gap between the two glasses.

Bobbie Blazy: Would like to see this as a horizontal with
a bit of a crop at top and bottom of horizontal.  Technically
well done with strong design.


Kostas Papakotas - ...
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/papakotas.html

Bob Talbot: Yup, looks like the expression seen on the face of "Jesus"
on the
cross.
I like the atmosphere and expression of the singer.
The hand bothers me though:  is it his or another singer holding the
mike?
It looks to be at a diffculty angel.

Bobbie Blazy: The finger leads me out of the photo-would
like to see this cropped  at just below neck. The face with
the eyes asks more questions of me than seeing the
rest of the photo. As it is now-I think the photo would not stand alone
but
in the grouping it would.


Christopher Strevens - Winchester Festival
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/strevens.html

Bob Talbot: I bet (hope) the original hold all the detail that 67375
bytes can't
do justice to.
There is so much fine detail in the stonework and the banners.
As presented it is well composed/cropped.
If I have a question it is the colo(u)r cast ... I feel it needs a
littel more blue (at least that is what the histogram suggests) but
then again, the stone is yellow not grey so I'm not sure.  Was it lit
by tungsten lights or is it daylight?

Bobbie Blazy: To me the strongest portion of the photo is the ceiling.
I keep going back to it and am not as much interested in the rest of the
photo.
Perhaps if there was a person/child in the foreground caught in the
festival
moment...it would be a stronger image.
Was the camera handheld?



Marilyn Dalrymple - Me?  You Want to Take Me Home?
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/dalrymple.html

Bob Talbot: Oh Maralyn, when they say "never work with children and
animals" I
think the animals can be much harder.
The cat looks really cute and I know the background to why you are
doing these shots (the rescue centre) soto that end.
1) the red rose, being red (as all photographers know) takes attention
away from the cat.  We want someone to adopt the cat, not the rose ;o)
2) the eyes must be sharp: I know cats are little bleeders when it
comes to keeping still (err, when still - eyes closed:  eyes open - we
move) but this would have so much more appeal if the eyes were the
focus.
3) The cat's pose is a good one:  getting a cat to look direct at the
lens is a nightmare for sure.

It it was not for our quarantine laws I would ask you to ship "me" now
...
Bobbie Blazy: My eye went to the felines eyes and noticed lack of
sharpness,
next went to rose in foreground next seeing plastic.  I would not
include the rose.
Would use a colored fabric beneath the cat (black for this little
kitty).
I see another cat in the background left...this must be a challenge to
shoot!

 jIMMY Harris - Angel Rock
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/jharris.html
Bob Talbot: YUK

Sorry jimmy, 39 dollars for that camera?  You were done.
I won't pretend to like the shot at all.
Waht it the point?  Seriously.

Sorry ...

Bobbie Blazy:  Looks like she was shot under a glass
shower door!  NOT an angel........
So what does a landscape-or cityscape look like with
this camera, lets see some more.


Robert Carlson - Hotel
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/carlson.html

Bob Talbot: Despite all the reflection-distortion this  picure works,
generally.
It does lack sharpness in the interesting areas but the pole is
annoying an is the sharpest bit.

As presented it is too "half-and-half" for me.  It improves
dramatically IMO if you remove 60 pixels or so from the right edge.

Is it a self portrait?  ;o)
I guess not -- is the woman another photographer or just shielding her
eyes from the sun?

Bobbie Blazy:  I see three vertical pictures here.
Not sure as a whole the image is as strong.


Dan Mitchell - Cottages
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/mitchell.html

Bob Talbot: First question - do you remember where on the Isle of Arran?

It looks familiar but I can't recall the place.

The effect is so easy to do now we have digital - in a way it has
devalued messing about with images.  Being trad makes no difference -
no allowances.
The black sky is the part I find hardest to live with pictorially

The effect is always intriguing though: turning an ordinary scene into
a graphic.   I suspect this suffers the same problem as Chris's image:
so much fine detail in the original that cut down to 150,000 pixels it
just is not done justice.

Bobbie Blazy: I appreciate the work involved on this image.
I would like to see the original scene side by side.


 Roderick Chen - yellow
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/chen.html

Bob Talbot:A classic "camera club" shot:  everything composed, no
distractions
...even the title chosen so as not to give any excuse for complaint.
Geometrical patterns in a grey building with "yellow" there to break
the gloom.  If thers is something else though it is that small patch
of sky which remionds us nature still exists.  But that nature seems
uncomfortable amongst the concrete ... or is it just that I feel
uncomfortable there?

It lacks critical sharpness:  was that because it was hand-held or
because you only used 30K of your 50K ration?

Bobbie Blazy: The foreground shadow and the yellow bounces me eye around

a bit much.
I see yellow paper or leaves in the foreground,,,cropping the top of
the photo out just below the yellow and red windows...much stronger.



Andrew Davidhazy -
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph/gallery/davidhazy.html
Yup, definitely a plank!

Bob Talbot: OK, it has a pattern.  I don't like the two drill holes
towards the
base ... cropping them makes it less of a vertical panorama which
don't work well on monitors.

I don't know about the "image managed" in PS bit either.  All three
channels seem a bit dark - the histogram showing virtually no use of
RGB values 210-255 in any channel. Being dark overall, the very dark
bottom right corner becomes even more of a flaw.

I'm left wishing I could see more detail in the wood (the grain
maybe?).  The pattern, while interesting, is just a pattern ...

Bobbie Blazy:  Hey who nailed the zebra? : )


_________________________
Thanks to the contibutors
Bob
--------------------------------------
Thanks for reading my first PF reviews.
Bobbie Blazy



















[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux