someone wrote:
>
>much as I admire Ernst Haas' work, the fundamental flaw with looking at the
>work of dead photographers, is that they are dead, gone, cablooie, and in
>many cases have been superceded by living photographer ...............
What fundamental flaw do you perceive only when you look at the work of a
dead photographer? Other than the obvious ramifications for the
photographer in question, I can't visualize image changes that might take
place upon the death of that photographer nor do I understand how that
photographer can be "superceded" upon her death.
>Just because a photographer is dead, doesn't make him/ her a master.
Indeed. But I've not noted any claims to the contrary.
Dave
East Englewood
--------------------------
There is only one industry in the world that takes as its point of
departure the supposition that all people are thieves - the record
industry. That is the only explanation for the fact that this industry
decided to scratch every CD it manufactures, as a means against theft.
- Yuval Dror
