Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Temp table or normal table for performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20 Aug 2009 13:43:10 GMT
Jasen Betts <jasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2009-08-19, Stephen Cook <sclists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Let's say I have a function that needs to collect some data from
> > various tables and process and sort them to be returned to the
> > user.
> 
> plpgsql functions don't play well with temp tables IME.

Why?

you mean that since you generally use temp table for computation and
looping several times over the table... a more expressive language
would be suited?


-- 
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux