On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Adrian Klaver<aklaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In the its a small world category I just ran across a streaming database called Telegraph(http://telegraph.cs.berkeley.edu/telegraphcq/v2.1/) yesterday. It is based on Postgres 7.3.2, so approach with caution. > Thanks Adrian, Very interesting. The pages seem to have moved. I had to read them in google cache. Will email them regarding the project roadmap and if they will be pursuing it for some time to come or is it only a minor research project, that will stop as soon as the research paper is submitted. Mailing list of the project though shows mails are decreasing to almost one per day. However, it threw a very interesting question for me. It was based on postgres itself, v. 7.2 but thats beside the point. What exactly the difference in layman sys admin terms between our everyday postgres and this time series data. postgres supports geo data types and many others. Whats the big issue in not having this sort of time series data type and query as a normal support by postgres? It would have a big feasibility in stock market data storage and analysis. I am sure there would be some other major scientific applications like real time data acquisition & analysis & etc. So why is this sort of application not supported in postgres natively? First time, I've come across a db application that I cannot handle with postgres in my 9 years of using postgres.. Best regards. Sanjay. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
