Chris Bowlby <excalibur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks for the response. I've run into situations where the database > has also been removed just before pg_autovacuum was about to check, and > there by kicks out an error (mainly an aesthetic issue, not really a > functional issue). That was fixed some time ago. It's not an argument for adding a "feature" like this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
